comparison and differentiate of behaviorist theory and nativist theory
Name : gohil hetalba
Std : m.a. - ii
sem – iii
Sub : paper no 12 ( elt)
Topic : comparison and differentiate
of behaviorist theory and nativist theory on learning and acquisition .
Roll no : 08
Submitted to : dept. of English
Maharaja
Krishna kumarsinhji Bhavnagar university
Year : 2013 – 2014
There are some basic advanced to describe how
language is acquired learnt and taught. The behaviorist theory Mentalist theory
, Rationalist theory and Interactionism, Native theory are some of these
theories.
The
behaviorist theory and mentalist theory are mainly applicable to the
acquisition of native languages. While the rest can account for foreign
language acquisition. The theories are complementary to each other.
Native
language growth must pave the way for foreign language growth. The basic
theories are fundamental pillars of language learning. Whose relevance to
education is undeniable.
“Infants
learn oral language from other human role models through a process involving,
imitation, rewards, and practice. Human role models in an infant’s environment
provide the stimuli and rewards.”
_ Cooter and Reutzel, 2004
When a child attempts oral language or imitates
the sounds or speech patterns they are usually praised and given affection for
their efforts.
Behaviorist
theory is basically a Psychological theory. It was founded by J.B. Watson, is
actually a theory of a native language learning advanced in part as a reaction
to traditional grammar. Leonard Bloomfield, O.N. Mowrer, B.F. Skinner, A.W.
Staats. Behaviorism was advanced in America as a new approach. It was based on
verbal behavior. Educational world gave him considerable response.
The
Nativist theory is where it is believed that we have an inborn ability to learn
and learning is in our genetics. N. Chomsky did many researches on this and has
the greatest influence on this theory.
Nativist theory can be interpreted as under :
Advocating the perpetuation of native societies. “
the old nativist prejudice against the foreign businessman”, the nativistc
faith preaches the old values.
_ C.K. Kluckhohn.
Nativist is of or relating to or advocating
nativism, nativist theories the traditional controversy between the nativistc
and empiristic theories.
The nativistc
theory with the biological belief that language is an innate feature of the
infant. Researcher Noam Chomsky is a firm advocate for this theory. He gave the
idea of a language organ which is called the Language Acquisition Device (LAD).
Other researchers have discredited Chomsky’s theories.
The behaviorist theory depends on the analysis of
human behavior in observable stimulus response interaction and the association
between them. Thorndike was the first behaviorist to explore the area that
learning is the establishment of associations on particular process of behavior
and consequences of that behavior. The behaviorist theory is a theory of
stimulus – response psychology.
“ Through
a trial and error process in which acceptable utterances are reinforced by
comprehension and approval an unacceptable utterances are inhibited by the lack
of reward, he gradually learns to make finer and finer discrimination until
his utterances approximate more and more
closely the speech of the community in which he is growing up.”
_ Wilga M Rivers
A highly
complex learning task can be learned by being broken down into small habits.
The acquisition of learning in infancy is governed by the acquisition of other
habits.
The nativist theory tells us that language does not develop quickly.
According to the Nativist theory it is more gradual process. Also this theory
does not put into account the many different languages spoken throughout the world.
Nativist theory deals with the development processes most closely associated
with initial language acquisition.
Acquisition
of language is the study of the process by which a person learns a language.
Nativist theories hypothesize that language is an innate fundamental part of
the human genetic make – up and that language acquisition occurs as a natural
part of the human experience.
Nativists
believe that children are born with an innate ability to organize laws of
language which enables children to easily learn a native language. They believe
that the children have specific language ability which assists them as the move
ahead. This idea is often contrasted to the behaviorist perspectives of Skinner and Watson.
Some principles operating on behaviorism:
Ø Behaviorist
theory dwells on the language that is spoken.
Ø Behaviorist theory is the habit formation
theory of language teaching and learning reminding us the learning of
structural grammar.
Ø The
stimulus response chain, S – R, is pure case of conditioning. Behaviorist
learning theory emphasizes conditioning and building from the simplest
conditioned responses to more and more complex behaviors.
Ø Positive reinforcement is reward while
negative reinforcement is punishment.
Ø Each person can learn equally if the
conditions in which the learning takes place are the same for each person.
Some limitation of Nativist
theories are:
Language doesn't develop as forecast by Nativists. This theory does not put different language
spoken in account. It is somewhat in contrast with the behaviorist theory. The
process of language acquisition in children is constrained.
The theorist of nativism believes that it is difficult to
explain how children within the first five years of life routinely master the
complex and puzzling grammar and the rules of the native language. Other
scholars however resisted the possibility that infants routine success at acquiring
the grammar of their native language requires anything more than forms of
learning.
Basic strategies of language learning within
the scope of behaviorist theory are imitation reinforcement and rewarding. In
behaviorist theory the process of learning relies more on generalization
rewarding condition three of which support the development of analogical
learning in children objection made on instinctively based learning will doubtlessly harm the creative way of learning . Behaviorist theory does not
explain social influence rate on a learn equally well in the same conditions in
which learning takes place. This theory is useful for the most part on animal
experimentation and learning.
It can be concluded for behaviorist theory
that as learning process is complex language acquisition cannot take place
through habit formation. Behaviorist theory aims at discovering behavioral
justification for designing language teaching in certain ways being a hub of
many language teaching and learning theories .
Now if we talk about the nativist theory the
debate surrounding the nativist theory is in the center on whether the inborn
capabilities are language specific or domain general such as those that enable
the infant to usually make sense of the world in terms of objects and
action. The anti nativist view has many
strands but a frequent theme is that
language emerges from usage in social contexts , using learning mechanisms that
are a part of a general cognitive learning apparatus.
Hello Hetalba your assignment about comparison and differentiate of behaviorist theory and nativist theory is totally convey your view about content. thank u for sharing your view.
ReplyDeleteThank U.
Deletea relevant write up thank you so much for enlightening further.
ReplyDeleteGreat it has really helped me in my assignment.
ReplyDeleteGood effort seen
ReplyDeleteUK HBO original